Forte vs. Vercel
Vercel hosts your frontend. Forte runs your whole app, including how you get paid.
Vercel is excellent for frontends and Next.js, and it wins on that deployment experience. Forte takes a different shape: it runs any container and adds user sign-in and payments, so the platform that hosts your app also signs in your users and bills them.
Feature by feature
A straightforward look at how Forte compares to Vercel.
| Vercel | Forte | |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy model | Frontend and serverless functions | Any container, always-on |
| Sign in your users | Bring your own (Auth.js library) | Built in (email, SMS, Google) |
| Charge your users | Not included | Built in, powered by Stripe |
| Debugging | Per-deployment logs | Request-to-log debugging |
| Pricing | Usage-based, can be hard to predict | Usage-based, transparent |
| Lock-in | Tuned for Next.js | Runs any container |
Deploy model
VercelFrontend and serverless functions
ForteAny container, always-on
Sign in your users
VercelBring your own (Auth.js library)
ForteBuilt in (email, SMS, Google)
Charge your users
VercelNot included
ForteBuilt in, powered by Stripe
Debugging
VercelPer-deployment logs
ForteRequest-to-log debugging
Pricing
VercelUsage-based, can be hard to predict
ForteUsage-based, transparent
Lock-in
VercelTuned for Next.js
ForteRuns any container
Migrate from Vercel in 15 minutes
No special tooling. No migration scripts. Just point Forte at your existing repository.